Evils Scale - Rating the world's good and evil

Logon | Register

Advertisement:

| | | | | |

Advertisement:

Joseph Stalin
Dictator

Josef Stalin was the de facto leader and dictator of the Soviet Union from about 1928 to his death in 1953. Stalin initiated the Great Purge in the 1930’s, a campaign of political repression, persecution and mass slaughter. Confiscations of grain and other food by the Soviet authorities under his orders contributed to a famine between 1932 and 1934 that resulted in millions of deaths in the Soviet Union. It was during Stalin’s rule that the USSR established itself as one of the two superpowers in the world, a position it maintained for nearly four decades. Despite their strikingly similar physical appearances, Josef Stalin and Super Mario are of no relation.t

< Previous
<< First Nominee

Random Nominee
Full Nominee List

Next >
Last Nominee >>

so and so Unregistered	1: 11/17/2006 2:00:30 PM Encyclopedia Idiotica lists Stalin among its ranks for killing all the generals of his army in a fit of paranoia, leaving his entire army in disarray right at the outbreak of WWII, encouraging Hitler to decide to go ahead and invade. Stalin had killed.... 3 of 5 marshals, 13 of 15 generals, 8 of 9 admirals, 50 of 57 army corps generals, 154 of 186 division generals, 16 of 16 comissars, and 25 of 28 army corps commissars, all under the direction of his head of secret police, Yezhov, who also had his predecessor shot. A couple years later, Stalin also had Yezhev killed. Hitler still wasn't successful, but Russia ended up losing over 10 million lives in that war, when proper defenses and organization early on would've changed the entire course.isplay:
Hayden Cooke Unregistered	2: 5/13/2007 7:21:42 AM He was a bad manisplay:
A.H. Unregistered	3: 5/26/2007 4:46:15 AM He was the biggest killer among politicians and the biggest winner. Still admire by some leftist idiots like Michael Moore,ispla
BLAEK Unregistered	4: 6/10/2007 8:29:24 PM WAY more evil then Hitler"0" style=
commie Unregistered	5: 6/12/2007 11:35:11 AM U all suck, joseph stalin was one of the best and most major communists of the century!:@tp
commie Unregistered	6: 6/12/2007 11:35:58 AM Worse than hitler, r u sick in the head! go read about him u stupid no it alls!ui
Burpo the Mad Clown Unregistered	7: 6/30/2007 2:27:59 PM He killed 40,000,000 of his own people. He and commie's nutbuddy Mao are,by far, the worst serial killers in history. No one is even close. Evil personified.
Dick the Ukie Hertz Unregistered	8: 7/9/2007 9:44:57 AM No greater evil than STALIN: Archived for Scholarly Study From the Toronto Sun - December 13, 1998 By ERIC MARGOLIS Contributing Foreign Editor As Britain's socialist government cleared the way for a gaudy show trial of that Great Satan of the left, Chile's Gen. Augusto Pinochet, the 65th anniversary of this century's bloodiest crime was utterly ignored. Leftists now baying for Pinochet's head don't want to be reminded of the Unknown Holocaust. In 1932, Soviet leader Josef Stalin unleashed genocide in Ukraine. Stalin determined to force Ukraine's millions of independent farmers - called kulaks - into collectivized Soviet agriculture, and to crush Ukraine's growing spirit of nationalism. Faced by resistance to collectivization, Stalin unleashed terror and dispatched 25,000 fanatical young party militants from Moscow - earlier versions of Mao's Red Guards - to force 10 million Ukrainian peasants into collective farms. Secret police units of OGPU began selective executions of recalcitrant farmers. When Stalin's red guards failed to make a dent in this immense number, OGPU was ordered to begin mass executions. But there were simply not enough Chekists (secret police) to kill so many people, so Stalin decided to replace bullets with a much cheaper medium of death - mass starvation. All seed stocks, grain, silage and farm animals were confiscated from Ukraine's farms. (Ethiopia's Communist dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam used the same method in the 1970s to force collectivization: the resulting famine cased one million deaths.) OGPU agents and Red Army troops sealed all roads and rail lines. Nothing came in or out of Ukraine. Farms were searched and looted of food and fuel. Ukrainians quickly began to die of hunger, cold and sickness. When OGPU failed to meet weekly execution quotas, Stalin sent henchman Lazar Kaganovitch to destroy Ukrainian resistance. Kaganovitch, the Soviet Eichmann, made quota, shooting 10,000 Ukrainians weekly. Eighty percent of all Ukrainian intellectuals were executed. A Ukrainian party member named Nikita Khruschchev helped supervise the slaughter. During the bitter winter of 1932-33, mass starvation created by Kaganovitch and OGPU hit full force. Ukrainians ate their pets, boots and belts, plus bark and roots. Some parents even ate infant children. The precise number of Ukrainians murdered by Stalin's custom-made famine and Cheka firing squads remains unknown to this day. The KGB's archives, and recent work by Russian historians, show at least seven million died. Ukrainian historians put the figure at nine million, or higher. Twenty-five percent of Ukraine's population was exterminated. Millions of victims. Six million other farmers across the USSR were starved or shot during collectivization. Stalin told Winston Churchill he liquidated 10 million peasants during the 1930s. Add mass executions by the Cheka in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania; the genocide of three million Muslims in the USSR; massacres of Cossacks and Volga Germans and Soviet industrial genocide accounted for at least 40 million victims, not including 20 million war dead. Kaganovitch and many senior OGPU officers (later, NKVD) were Jewish. The predominance of Jews among Bolshevik leaders, and the frightful crimes and cruelty inflicted by Stalin's Cheka on Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland, led the victims of Red Terror to blame the Jewish people for both communism and their suffering. As a direct result, during the subsequent Nazi occupation of Eastern Europe, the region's innocent Jews became the target of ferocious revenge by Ukrainians, Balts and Poles. While the world is by now fully aware of the destruction of Europe's Jews by the Nazis, the story of the numerically larger holocaust in Ukraine has been suppressed, or ignored. Ukraine's genocide occurred 8-9 years before Hitler began the Jewish Holocaust, and was committed, unlike Nazi crimes, before the world's gaze. But Stalin's murder of millions was simply denied, or concealed by a
steve Unregistered	9: 7/13/2007 9:19:15 AM was that a dirty sanchez he was sportin?
afrika korps Unregistered	10: 8/26/2007 3:20:38 AM I think Hitler is better than comrad Stalin.h="0
@stalin Unregistered	11: 9/27/2007 9:51:59 AM Stalin did evil things I dont know if he was actually evil though. He didnt aim to kill millions like hitler. He did it to achieve his goals. There is a difference. He was responsible for a lot more deaths than hitler though. Him and Saddam are very similiar and id say they should tie for 2nd after hitler. Then again there are a lot of evil people that werent given the oppurtunity to kill/harm/effect many people like charles manson or some of the other big serial killers but they would have loved to if they could.
Narkom Unregistered	12: 11/1/2007 4:57:41 PM This site uses biased information. It is using information from the Amerikan side, not even presenting the Sowjet side. If you'll take a look at the Sowjet records(which you won't) You will see that fatalities as a result of Sowjet penal system were more around 400,000. And the Ukranian famine did not cost nearly as many lives as is suggested. You need to take a look and realise that every source is biased, what you must do is pick through them and find the one which most likely has the facts. In the case it is actual records of Sowjetunion itself, rather than made up numbers by Robert Conquest, Goebbles, and Hearst.<i
you have a world to win! Unregistered	13: 11/3/2007 1:45:40 PM Stalin was a great man. He furthered socialism for all of ussr. Most of the deaths tagged on his name were due to famine because of his 2 5 year plans (which industrialized russia). and OF COURSE Stalin had to destroy political opposition because the previous ruling party still had alot of ideological power, and needed to be ideologicaly overthrown. many of you obviously dont know how to have a revolution!! the ruling party (the czars and their sympathizers) dont give up power! I find it funny that everyone hates bush, but loves the propaganda his nation and the west has feed you. oh and good job citing "Encyclopedia Idiotica".. you guys really need to research your facts from reliable sources, not proganda. and HOW is he more evil than hitler??? hitler tried to wipe out an entire race!!! src="
you have a world to win! Unregistered	14: 11/3/2007 1:47:49 PM Stalin was a great man. He furthered socialism for all of ussr. Most of the deaths tagged on his name were due to famine because of his 2 5 year plans (which industrialized russia). and OF COURSE Stalin had to destroy political opposition because the previous ruling party still had alot of ideological power, and needed to be ideologicaly overthrown. many of you obviously dont know how to have a revolution!! the ruling party (the czars and their sympathizers) dont give up power! I find it funny that everyone hates bush, but loves the propaganda his nation and the west has feed you. oh and good job citing "Encyclopedia Idiotica".. you guys really need to research your facts from reliable sources, not proganda. and HOW is he more evil than hitler??? hitler tried to wipe out an entire race!!! src="
you have a world to win! Unregistered	15: 11/3/2007 1:50:00 PM Stalin was a great man. He furthered socialism for all of ussr. Most of the deaths tagged on his name were due to famine because of his 2 5 year plans (which industrialized russia). and OF COURSE Stalin had to destroy political opposition because the previous ruling party still had alot of ideological power, and needed to be ideologicaly overthrown. many of you obviously dont know how to have a revolution!! the ruling party (the czars and their sympathizers) dont give up power! I find it funny that everyone hates bush, but loves the propaganda his nation and the west has feed you. oh and good job citing "Encyclopedia Idiotica".. you guys really need to research your facts from reliable sources, not proganda. and HOW is he more evil than hitler??? hitler tried to wipe out an entire race!!! src="
Che Guevera Unregistered	16: 11/5/2007 3:31:54 AM Biggest mass murderer in history"0"
Che Guevera Unregistered	17: 11/5/2007 3:32:26 AM Biggest mass murderer in history"0"
Ernst Thaelmann Unregistered	18: 11/5/2007 4:53:56 AM The only good commie is a dead commie
tom just tom Unregistered	19: 11/5/2007 4:54:24 AM Hitler was a nice guy compared to murdering Joe Stalin?sid=1
mike Unregistered	20: 1/16/2008 10:20:49 AM 1) @you have a world to win, if you're on their side liearn to spell Soviet, not Sowjet. 2) @you have aworld to win, It had nothing to do with the tsars by that point, the revolution was 8 years before stalin came to power and they were all shot 3 years before. 3) @ (predictably) you have a world to win, he didn't further socialism, he decided to have a half baked version, which involved demi capitalism which had been in power since the introduction of the N.E.P by Lenin. 4) @ (I can't even be bothered to type your name anymore) Yes, Hitler tried to wipe out a race and killed 6,000,000 Jews but Stalin managed, without even trying particulalrly hard to kill around 40,000,000 OF HIS OWN PEOPLE. Also @whoever it was who said he only did it to further his aims, yes, that's true, does that make it right. You can say the same of any murderer.isplay
marko Unregistered	21: 2/9/2008 5:20:40 AM he killed to many of his own people
ethnic bleaching Unregistered	22: 2/16/2008 7:28:03 PM I'm undecided about all those Soviets- but those Sowjets, no they're definitely a bunch of evil suns of beachesone"></i
mike Unregistered	23: 2/16/2008 7:29:19 PM Stop making fun of me- I'm liearning to spiel.h=
. Unregistered	24: 4/27/2008 12:17:29 PM .
Meng-ten Unregistered	25: 6/10/2008 10:13:50 AM I hate him!!!isplay:non
Topcat Unregistered	26: 8/18/2008 7:22:07 PM Ties Hitlerisplay:none"
Frenchie Member	27: 8/26/2008 12:05:30 PM Hitler, Osama, and Stalin should take the top 3. Not Bush and Saddam. <_<n.
TTC Unregistered	28: 8/27/2008 5:02:15 AM You know that if Stalin didn't do anything, that Russia would still be the backwards nation that it was before he took over. It's the same with Mao, the point is that if Russia weren't a Super power, we wouldn't be in space, or have many of the other inventions that came out of the cold war. you people should all stop being very biased, so he killed 40 million people, read on, did he get anything? yes he got control of the whole country, and Russia sent a man into space, and all that other stuff it couldn't do if it's population was revolting all the time. Another thing is, what about all the people killed during wars, and Disease? They all outweigh these petty killings by these people. you people should all just stop and think for a few days more, and read from many perspectives, not just the American one.ne
Frenchie Member	29: 8/27/2008 10:19:43 AM I'm sorry, but 40 million people's deaths can't be brushed of to the side. The ends doesn't justify the means. By killing all those people he led Russia to be a superpower, ect. However, that's 40 million families losing a loved one. 40 million people who could have lived much longer, dead. And if you don't care about their lives, think about what they could have done for the world. Out of 40 million people, atleast a handful are going to have a highly positive affect on the world. And that would be without the death countone"></ifra
GAMBIT Unregistered	30: 10/16/2008 4:14:06 AM Joseph Stalin is among the most evil men ever to walk the earth. It is frightening what some people will do for greed & ambition."0" styl
i am always right Unregistered	31: 11/2/2008 5:33:17 PM I agree that stalin was a good leader and revolutionused the economy, so to speak. But killing 40 million of his own people can't be forgotten. I think hitler was more evil as he tried to wipe out entire races. stalin wanted the best for his country but he didn't care about the people he cared about the country. i think he became overwhelmed iwht power. i can see both sides of him good and bad but at the end of the day 40 million of his own people died because of him, but all for the good of the economy.tp
lucyfields Unregistered	32: 11/2/2008 5:37:21 PM to i am always right- i think you are right in what you say. theres two sides to every story. but he still murdered all those people, makinh him one of the most evil people in history. tp
leaders of the past Unregistered	33: 11/11/2008 3:17:47 PM he was bad but hitler is still #1 killer. i think about it!
StopBush Unregistered	34: 11/20/2008 4:29:43 AM Bad, but not top-3 material... 1. Dick Cheney 2. George W. Bush 3. Adolf Hitlerne
truth Unregistered	35: 12/3/2008 2:27:34 PM lmao Hes does look like Super Mario
???????? Unregistered	36: 12/13/2008 6:16:11 AM stalin was the best dicatator and the adolph hitler was the most best dicatator of the century src=
topcat Unregistered	37: 12/20/2008 12:14:48 PM For crying out loud - Hitler was a rank amateur compared to Stalin and Mao Tse Tung. all of these men (mmm -all men - strange, that) were concerned with their own power and didn't give a toss about politics - politics were a means to an end, the end being total control. Pol Pot was the same, as were Idi Amin and Saddam Hussein. I agree that Hitler's holocaust stands as the ultimate horror because of the AUTOMATION of the murder of the Jewish people, rather than the numbers involved. There is something particularly horrific about such a mechanical method of murder. The only things that stop Bush being as bad are a) he's thick; b) he's a pawn of big business and c)he's worried about public opinion. Tony Blair is no better - in fact, worse, because he's bright enough to know what a liar and bloody-handed butcher he is, but as long as he's coining it he doesn't give a toss, aand his letter-box mouthed missus loads the guns for him to fire. They are all murderers - in God's eyes, he who saves one life, saves the world - is it the same about he who destroys one life?ig
Matt Unregistered	38: 1/23/2009 3:21:16 AM Stalin was sick!!!! not the greatest communist (communism isn't great anyway)uild
Alec Unregistered	39: 1/26/2009 2:49:19 PM I'm doing a project on Stalin right now and he is a very bad person. He killed around 62 million people, most of them were his own men. I agree with "@stalin" on the top of the posting list. Stalin could of achieved his goals in a different way though. Vladimir Lenin was a way better ruler for the U.S.S.R. and saw what Stalin was becoming into, But sadly he died before he could warn everyone about Stalin. Visit www.alecsweb.synthiasite.com It's my website It is pretty cool. I will be using this site on my bibliography for my project thanks again!"0" styl
love Unregistered	40: 3/14/2009 12:42:36 AM he was a great manispla
Victor Christy Unregistered	41: 3/25/2009 6:42:14 PM Stalin is to my mind, the titanic figure of the 20th century, all that power of that Soviet Russian state was concentrated in one man. He knew how to take peasants to whose born without shoes and so they could make him into a Supreme Generalissimo, the man who conquered Hitler, and also'' The Man Of Steel''.
Victor Christy Unregistered	42: 3/25/2009 6:44:20 PM Take a good look at Russia today who is the hero, Stalin had millions of Russian people killed, but He also turned Russia into a Superpower. He was a great man.?s
gasoline Unregistered	43: 4/4/2009 7:41:55 PM even my seven year old brother knows hitler was better!!!?si
Ochre Unregistered	44: 4/6/2009 10:32:52 AM I think an important distinction between Hitler and Stalin is the reasons they did what they did. Hitler wanted Germany to be the most powerful nation on the planet. Stalin wanted the same, give or take some bullshit about empowering the working man. However, Hitler got what he wanted by framing the Jews for ruining his country, galvanizing the disillusioned youth of Germany, and then gassing a few million people. Then he started WWII, and the rest is history. Stalin got what he wanted by starving, executing, freezing, and generally dicking over 40 million people. The only difference I'm seeing is that Hitler was crazy, and Stalin was sane. In a way, one could argue that Hitler was less evil because he was clearly a disturbed individual, whereas Stalin did what he did out of cold, remorseless logic.
gasoline Unregistered	45: 4/8/2009 3:00:14 PM why is this monster below hitler??????????h="0"<
JL Unregistered	46: 4/20/2009 10:08:14 AM O my god! People think Hitler is better than Stalin!?! They seriously wish Rusia and East Europe were rules by Nazi`s instead of Communists?!t
iloveharrypotter Unregistered	47: 4/20/2009 4:25:03 PM in gods eyes, every sin is equally evil, but i say stalin was worse than hitler. hitler killed because he had a minor mental problem. he thought he was doing what jesus wanted hom to do. hitler also blamed the jews for losing ww1. he also thought germany would be better without jews and retards and gays. Stalin killed for his own selfish reasons. im not saying i like nazis im saying stalin is evil.tp:/
bozo Unregistered	48: 4/21/2009 4:41:18 PM he just needs a hug. :)"0" style="
gasoline Unregistered	49: 4/29/2009 4:34:37 PM what the fuck is this guy doing below hitler??!!?i
m&m Unregistered	50: 4/29/2009 4:39:13 PM HITLER WAS BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"0"<
hehehehehe Unregistered	51: 5/14/2009 10:22:59 AM jf;lskajd;flkjas;dljf;ljasdl;kfj"0"
hehehehe Unregistered	52: 5/14/2009 10:23:35 AM u all suckisplay:none">
:) Unregistered	53: 5/18/2009 11:04:00 AM Being Jewish isnt a race!! It's a religion! Both of these men were very smart but both very bad. I'm not saying what they did was wrong or right but if you think about how many people they had following every word they said they would have had to be great leaders (in the eyes of the people not being killed).
hahahahahahahahahahaha Unregistered	54: 6/11/2009 5:30:29 PM stalin was evil! he killed 20,000,000 in his gulags alone! under joe, the gulag conditions worsened and i read that people could go to a gulag for being late for work! he also let russia starve.tp
Hmmm Unregistered	55: 6/20/2009 6:24:13 PM Hitler whas better??????? this guy ho said that---->Fuck u first of all, and secound if hitler whas her today he wold fuck u all up the man whas not bad but EAVIL.. Ther is a perpes with all that what stalin did eaven if he kild all thoes people, it´s saad but true, look at ussr today.... Stalin did it for a perpes...Hitler did it for the race and relegion, so who the fuck is the sick basterd then...tp
gasoline Unregistered	56: 7/16/2009 6:51:58 PM Hmmm needs a new brain for christmas. stalin killed for no good reason.n.ru
peace&love Unregistered	57: 7/16/2009 9:16:53 PM Everyone that is saying that Stalin is a bad man, go do some research! If it wasn't for Stalin doing what he did, NWO would have pretty much ruled USSR and WWII would have definitely gone on a lot longer. Yes, he killed many people, but if you really think about it, if it wasnt for that, things would have turned out a lot worse. And for those who dont believe a word i say, why dont you ask someone from Russia who actually knows about their history?"0"
gasoline Unregistered	58: 7/17/2009 8:36:08 PM i do know that stalin did help us during ww2 but his gulags were almost exactly like the nazi death camps. i know a little russian history too.ig
the smart girl Unregistered	59: 7/19/2009 7:10:18 PM peace&love sounds like a commie, but i wont jump to conclusions. if the bolsheviks never came to power, the romanovs still might be ruling. yes, the czar was an idiot, but stalin and lenin killed millions more innocent people.isplay:
oatcake girl Unregistered	60: 7/29/2009 8:30:10 AM hey what about mao. he killed more people than both of them. also stalin killed 1,000,000 more people in 18 months in one country than died in the entire holocaust he is evil and sick. he sealed those people in, took all there food and left them to die, they went so mad with hunger parents ate their own children, any man who could let that go on is evil. also both hitler and stalin had 2 motives power and power end of. http://www.historyplace.com/worldhistory/genocide/stalin.htm but then no one else did anything to stop it so doesn't that make us all evil in a wayh=
JW Frogen Unregistered	61: 8/8/2009 4:57:06 AM Stalin did no mean to hurt anyone, he just never found his "inner child". It was sent of to a gulag in Siberiaone"></if
Astounded One Unregistered	62: 9/5/2009 11:13:24 PM The anti-Stalin views expressed here are not necessarily American, and they are certainly not excusing Hitler. So let’s focus on the real subject. I am American, I am part Russian, and part Jewish. Being anti-Stalin does not make me anti-Russian. In fact, I dislike Thomas Jefferson as much as I dislike Stalin. Jefferson was a big hypocrite who beat animals and wrote about freedom and liberty while having slave children with his slave Sally Hemings. Don't get me started on everything else that slimeball did. If I were from Belgium, I would still want King Leopold on this list of mass murderers. He killed 10 million people in the Congo to get phenomenally rich on his rubber plantations. He is as evil as anyone who ever lived. I do not believe that ends justify means and this has nothing to do with my being American. Now, there are a few different arguments going on here and a few very funny comments that I appreciate. As for the views, some people here judge Hitler and Stalin by their motives, not their crimes. Our courts do not work this way, and for a good reason: It is very hard to be certain of someone's motive in most cases. And psychopathic murderers can be very convincing liars. Was Stalin's motive noble? Did he believe that he killed millions for the good of Russia? Was Hitler murdering for the good of Germany, in his own sick mind? Does that make these crimes less sinful? Stalin killed far more people, so is he worse than Hitler? Well, I would say his crime is worse--it is certainly the bigger crime--but maybe he is no worse---no more evil than Hitler. Maybe Ted Bundy is just as evil as Hitler and Stalin. (Ted only killed about 40 people, so he is not even in their league in terms of size of crime.) There may be a point where you can't get any more evil. You’ve reached bottom. True psychopaths seem to commit as many crimes as they can until they are caught or they die—they never seem to say, OK, I’ve killed enough people, I am satified. You never hear of serial killers repenting and becoming good people. They have no guilt and no remorse—that is what makes them truly evil. If there were 50 million Jews, gypsies, and gays in Germany, I imagine Hitler would have been happy to gas them all—so this would make him as bad as Stalin, in terms of intent and motive. But to judge the nature of the crime itself---killing people based on their religion, ethnicity, or lifestyle, as Hitler (and many others) have done, does not seem more evil (to me) than starving them to death because of their politics or geographic location, or executing them by the hundreds, or raping and bludgeoning them cause they are female, as in Bundy’s case. Arguing about which one is more evil seems almost senseless---and would be pretty hard to prove, if one really is more evil than the other. We committed genocide on the Indians, plain and simple---are we as evil as Hitler? I think perhaps we are. I am sure there are a few Indians who would agree. So judging by the nature of the crime gets awfully complex when they are so all so completely evil. It probably makes more sense to agree that they are all as evil as evil can be and to try to figure out why people here on this list would defend any one of them. To me, that is a crime in itself, of sorts. Why is it happening and why arent we all as shocked as I am? Maybe we are. I neeed to say that defending mass murderers here is unacceptable. There is actually an argument right here about whether or not Stalin was a monster or a great leader! Some of his defenders say that we who despise him are not educated. That is nonsense and on what grounds could he/she say that? how could he/she know how educated we were? It is common for people who do not have good arguments to attack the credibility of their opponents rather than address the issue they bring up. I have found that the more I know about any of these brutal butchers—the more horrific they seem to me. Not only have I been reading about criminals and mass mu
Ylviste Unregistered	63: 9/11/2009 7:10:10 AM Stalin was a crazy man who became insane with power and the idea of his own greatness. The difference between the mass murders caused by him and Hitler were that the hard-working Caucasian non-Jewish person in Germany didn't have to fear Hitler, whereas everybody of Stalin in the USSR. With that aside, trying to figure out who of men is the most evil is just too biblical and stupid. Stalin wasn't evil, he just became insane with power and the fear of losing it.
yo Unregistered	64: 9/11/2009 2:43:55 PM stalin is an idiotispla
hahahahahahahahaha Unregistered	65: 9/16/2009 2:52:17 PM he was not a nice person."0" style=
Facts Unregistered	66: 10/23/2009 5:26:15 PM Way worse then Hitler by far. Killed about 60 million total people and on top of that he is communist was is just terrible all on its own"0"
a guy Unregistered	67: 11/9/2009 9:25:47 AM worst dictator of all times. Shame on Roosevelt who allied with him.
gasoline Unregistered	68: 11/23/2009 2:14:44 PM "a guy",what do you mean Roosevelt ALLIED with him? try Roosevelt was his best friend! Ok, maybe not BEST friend, but they were more than allies. Roosevelt was stupid.go.p
hahahahahahahahaha Unregistered	69: 11/23/2009 2:16:41 PM he is also ugly.isplay:
deevil d Unregistered	70: 11/26/2009 9:38:35 PM aaaaaaaaa HE WAS AN EVIL SUPER BAD MAN p.s he sorta does look like Marioui
ingenius idoiot Unregistered	71: 11/26/2009 9:43:36 PM he was most certantily evil he had 1 of his own sons disowned 4 no apearnt reason whatsoever and nearly killed his neice in the end he had killed 28 million people from Russia and sent over 8 million to places around the world to be killed or put in slavery and never 2 return alive he is evil so i vote Good.....................just kidding i voted him Evilh="0"
jonathan Unregistered	72: 1/11/2010 6:27:30 PM Stalin is the devil!isp
jason Unregistered	73: 1/25/2010 5:34:16 AM Got news for you Stalin had many burried while they were still alive....his men could not be bothered while they waited for them to starve to death. Families turned to cannibalism and ate their own children. In terms of torture Stalin was worse then Hitler (starvation and buried alive is the worse way to die), but they are both equal Evil. It is like debating killing someone with 1 bullet or 100 bullets....either way you end up with a dead person."0"<
yo Unregistered	74: 2/1/2010 1:09:33 PM STALIN CAN GO DIE IN A HOLE!"0" sty
hello. Unregistered	75: 2/25/2010 6:43:42 PM Stalin ROCKSon
hitler Unregistered	76: 3/21/2010 1:47:03 PM Stalin is an idiotispla
general cholette Unregistered	77: 4/7/2010 1:32:52 PM stalin a great dictator and an old friend of mine, yes he did bad things but don't we alltp
general cholette Unregistered	78: 4/7/2010 1:32:53 PM stalin a great dictator and an old friend of mine, yes he did bad things but don't we alltp
JW Frogen Unregistered	79: 4/7/2010 8:21:44 PM Factoid, when Stalin died they found the worlds largest collection of gay Cossack porn.tp:/
cheap live sex Unregistered	80: 4/10/2010 12:19:15 AM http://www.cheaplivesexshows.com work it
kenziee_131 Member	81: 4/11/2010 5:28:42 PM whos this cheap sex guy.... i mean rrly? cud u take ur porno self somewhere else??!nem
.............. Unregistered	82: 4/25/2010 8:21:12 PM UR REALLY NERDS HAHAHAi
Josef Stalin Unregistered	83: 6/26/2010 2:10:35 PM You people are retarded stalin did not kill 40 million of his own he killed only like a few hundred thousand. Plus he in a sense saved the world if he had not equipped the red army right russia would be over run by the nazis and then the allies would have all those other men to fight france would fall and then hitler would attack america"0" style="
dogmadness4 Unregistered	84: 7/6/2010 1:04:39 AM For Christ sake. Starlin was not evil. When he died, his whole country was upset. You all need to watch the film, "And Then There Were Giants." And then you will understand. God, you're so blinded by your hate for comunism that you can't see through it. Comunism is NOT evil, it just does not work, for example, if we were equal, we would all get equal pay, so who would want to be a doctor or a fireman? You're all uneducated wankers. Burn in hell (except the people who don't think badly of Starlin.)nemo
gasoline Unregistered	85: 7/6/2010 7:26:16 PM Stalin's a good guy, huh? yeah sure he is. he just killed a few million people for no good reason. communism is good in theory, yet the main philosophy is to steal from people and spread others wealth around. whatever. bullshit.ispla
hahahaha Unregistered	86: 7/9/2010 9:38:44 PM just cuz people were upset when he died doesn't make him a good guy. i know little boys that cried for Michael Jackson!!isplay:n

Name:
Comment:

1	George W. Bush
2	Cameron Hooker
3	Idi Amin Dada
4	Albert Fish
5	Ronald Reagan
6	Adolf Hitler
7	Joseph Stalin
8	Mao Zedong
9	Pol Pot
10	Ivan the Terrible

Top 100 Evil

1	Barack Obama
2	Alexander Solzhenitsyn
3	Alfred Hitchcock
4	John Adams
5	Nikola Tesla
6	Jesus Christ
7	Rosa Parks
8	Super Mario
9	Niels Bohr
10	Gandhi

Top 100 Good

1	Live Webcam Sex
2	Web Girls Online
3	Smooth Operator
4	NSFW News
5	GoYK.com
6	Free Sex Webcams
7	Who'd You Bang?
8	Funpictures.dk
9	Wellplayed.net
10	Thee Church Ov MOO

View All Referals
Add Your Site

Website design by SteeleITS - Privacy Policy